Why nuclear power will never supply the world's energy needs i really doubt that we've already made nuclear energy as efficient, safe and potent as we possibly can it just happens to be. Another reason that nuclear energy has become much more attractive is that it decreases our dependence on fossil fuels the burning of fossil fuels (oil, gas and coal) emit greenhouse gases, but there is also a limited supply and we are quickly using up our reserves.
Just as you shouldn't invest all your money into one stock, it's wise for a country to have a diverse portfolio of energy sources to ensure constant coverage, experts said you need a healthy mix of power supply and power sources in order to guarantee a stable grid, hosemann said. The united states’ dysfunctional nuclear waste management system has an unfortunate international side effect: it limits the options for preventing other countries from using nuclear power infrastructure to produce nuclear weapons. “in summary, the 7 reasons why we should say no to nuclear power are: 1 because it is not a fast enough response to climate change 2 because it is too expensive 3 because the need for baseload electricity is exaggerated 4 because the problem of waste remains unresolved 5 because it will increase the risk of nuclear war 6.
Why we should use more nuclear power as an energy source very valid argument to increase our use of nuclear power as an energy source one of the reasons we should use more nuclear energy is. The burning of fossil fuels (oil, gas and coal) emit greenhouse gases, but there is also a limited supply and we are quickly using up our reserves since nuclear fuel contains much more energy than a similar mass of hydrocarbons or coal, nuclear energy is an attractive alternative to carbon-based fuels with emerging economies in india, china, and russia, the need for more energy is straining the ability to keep up the supply for every increasing demand.
Why (or why not) nuclear energy just as you shouldn't invest all your money into one stock, it's wise for a country to have a diverse portfolio of energy sources to ensure constant coverage. Renewable energy is a great way to power things we should use that rather than nuclear, coal, and other non-renewable energy sources come on don't be stupid there is only one earth.
10 nuclear subsidies take money away from more effective alternative energy subsidies subsidies for nuclear reactors wouldn’t subsidize nuclear technology—they would subsidize the nuclear industry congress should fund research of clean, alternative energy technologies that promise to rival fossil fuels in cost—without subsidies. We should use nuclear power instead of other sources of energy because it can produce high levels of electricity without causing damage to our environment and atmosphere.
Here are the top 10 reasons why we shouldn’t build any more nuclear reactors: 1 nuclear waste -- the waste from nuclear power plants will be toxic for humans for more than 100,000 years.
Why we still need nuclear power foreign affairs (nov/dec 2011) if nuclear energy is to enjoy a sustained renaissance, the challenge of managing nuclear waste for thousands of years must be met it limits the options for preventing other countries from using nuclear power infrastructure to produce nuclear weapons if countries such as. The technology behind nuclear power is fully developed, so nuclear energy is unlikely to get much cheaper continued subsidies would be necessary to make nuclear cost-competitive with other energy sources, but will not lower the overall price of nuclear power 9 other clean energy technologies are cheaper, cleaner, and faster to build. Currently we supply 17% of our energy needs from alternative power sources and it hasn't hurt us one bit (and we're still exporting energy - even after half our nuclear reactors went offline after.