Facts the supreme court’s decision in miranda v arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations in each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world.
Miranda v arizona, 384 us 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the united states supreme court.
In a 7-2 decision, the supreme court held that miranda, being a constitutional decision of this court, may not be in effect overruled by an act of congress the dickerson ruling was an overwhelming affirmation of the right to remain silent in the face of police interrogation. The miranda ruling protects a suspect's fifth amendment right against self-incrimination the miranda warning, a written statement of these rights, is normally recited by a police officer before interrogating the suspect in police custody.
On this day in 1966, the supreme court hands down its decision in miranda v arizona, establishing the principle that all criminal suspects must be advised of their rights before interrogation. In no 759, miranda v arizona, the police arrested the defendant and took him to a special interrogation room, where they secured a confession in no 760, vignera v.