Comparing rousseau and mill on liberty essay 1838 words | 8 pages the term “civil or social liberties” is one that garners a lot of attention and focus from both rousseau and mill, although they tackle the subject from slightly different angles.
On the limitations of the freedom of expression 1 introduction the constitution, article 3, section 4 provides: “no law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or of the right of people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievance the constitution forbids not the abridging of speech, but the abridging of freedomof speech.
Mill forcefully counters rousseau’s claims that individual rights make slaves of the individual to his own desires instead, he celebrates these very rights as fundamental to the health of a society, the good of its citizens, and the freedom of mankind.
To rousseau freedom is attained when people follow the general will mill's essay on liberty is a strong counter argument to rousseau s conception of freedom, especially regarding the general will according to mill, in order for a society to be free it must avoid interfering with the lives of its people wherever possible.
Two of the masterminds who put forth their work on liberty and freedom of speech were john stuart mill and jean-jacque rousseau the concepts penned by rousseau contradict those that were constructed by mil while the former focused on the functioning of the society as a whole, the latter advocated the rights of the individual to his freedom.
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic comparative essay on rousseau's social contract and john stuart mill's on liberty with a personal 20% discount. While rousseau introduces his concept of the “general will” as a “free contractual state” with regards to the relationship between individual and the sovereign mill’s theory revolves around, and prioritizes individual wills which creates a sense of an almost unlimited amount of freedom. Free essay: in his writing, rousseau describes two main forms of freedom— the absolute liberty we enjoy in the state of nature and the freedom we preserve in. Comparing john locke, john stuart mill, and jean-jacques rousseau john locke, john stuart mill, and jean-jacques rousseau all dealt with the issue of political freedom within a society.
By forcing its subjects to obey the social contract, the sovereign essentially forces its subjects to maintain the civil freedom that is part and parcel of this social contract some commentators have gone so far as to accuse rousseau of totalitarianism, though this is a bit far-fetched. John stuart mill, an english philosopher and economist, gives a similar view on freedom as the cambridge dictionary, and looks at the ‘nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual’ (mill, 6.