Network performance evaluation for rip, ospf and eigrp routing protocols abstract: the main function of a network layer is to route packets from the source machine to the destination machine algorithms that are used for route selection and data structure are the main parts for the network layer. In this running era of technology, the technology of communication is increasing day by day comparative analysis of eigrp and ospf routing information technology essay print reference this published: 23rd ospf works with single autonomous system and distribute the information across the network in ospf the cost of interface is.
The main contribution of the project is to investigate the network performance by running eigrp and ospf routing protocols on a network and to conclude which routing protocol provide better performance in terms of voice and video. The evaluation results show that eigrp routing protocol provides a better performance than ospf routing protocol for real time applications through network simulations we have proved that eigrp is more cpu intensive than ospf and hence uses a lot of system power.
Routing protocol is taking a vital role in the modern internet era a routing protocol determines how the routers communicate with each other to forward the packets by taking the optimal path to.
The simulation study is completed by running voip application in different network scenarioswith different interior routing protocols namely: rip, ospf and eigrp and with different queuing. What are the advantages of running eigrp over running ospf what are the advantages of running eigrp over running ospf why should one use eigrp and not ospf 1905 views where the spokes only need partial/summarized information of the network (beyond the hub) moreover, a topology change anywhere in the network would cause a convergence.
Abstract: the main function of a network layer is to route packets from the source machine to the destination machine algorithms that are used for route selection and data structure are the main parts for the network layer in this paper we examine the network performance when using three routing protocols, rip, ospf and eigrp. I would like to ask you if you could speak a bit about eigrp vs ospf both are igp protocols and if you have a network only with cisco routers what is the best option while eigrp networks.
While eigrp doesn't support the same topology concept as ospf (ie areas), you can easily provide multi-topology support via multiple eigrp processes support for new technology: ospf-te is a function used solely by mpls service providers, and has been around since 1999. Request pdf on researchgate | network performance evaluation for rip, ospf and eigrp routing protocols | the main function of a network layer is to route packets from the source machine to the. Performance analysis of ospf and eigrp routing protocols for greener internetworking (eigrp) and open shortest path first (ospf) protocols evaluation of these routing protocols is performed based on the quantitative metrics such as convergence time, jitter, end-to-end delay, throughput and packet loss through the simulated network models.
Two distance vector routing protocol domain, rip_network (configured to used rip routing protocol) and eigrp_network (configured to used eigrp routing protocol) and the green background network domain represent a link-state routing protocol ospf_network (configured to used ospf routing protocol) as shown in figure2 below. Running simultaneously ospf and eigrp on the same interface is it possible to run simultaneously ospf and eigrp on the same router's interface (the interface has two ip addresses from two different ip classes, every routing protocol is using one of the ip classes) without redistributing routes between ospf and eigrp. Hi, the advantages of eigrp over ospf is: fast converge actually, eigrp is the fastest routing protocol, eigrp has backup route, so when a route is unreachable, the backup route is active.